Trying to diagnose code P0300, random multiple misfires?

Tiny
SWALDO
  • MEMBER
  • 20 POSTS
Injector change still pending - slight delay.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Monday, October 30th, 2023 AT 7:43 AM
Tiny
AL514
  • MECHANIC
  • 4,180 POSTS
You can try changing out the MAF like Ken said as well. Even try unplugging it and see if it runs on a default strategy for the MAF data. Some manufacturers do that, if it just stalls out then the ECM doesn't have a default setting for the MAF. I see in the wiring diagrams there is a MAP sensor as well. So it might run with the MAF unplugged.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Monday, October 30th, 2023 AT 12:29 PM
Tiny
SWALDO
  • MEMBER
  • 20 POSTS
Hello gentlemen, here is update:

The injector change was completed. I used new OEM injectors from Standard Motor Parts.
This did not resolve the misfire condition at high load, nor did it change the †double digit negative LTFTs whenever the car is moving’. In fact, they got a little lower, to the point of -19, which I hadn’t seen before anything less that -15.

Then the MAF sensor was changed with new OEM sensor Delphi brand.
This indeed made the double digit negative LTFTs vanish, and now the figures are †normal’. This did not resolve the misfire condition though.

On close examination of previous data, it appeared the old MAF would jump a little higher once in a while versus frames right before and after. On these frames, I would get a VE of 110% or 115% and concluded eventually that maybe isn’t right. The highest MAFs I’d see would be 18 or 19, and %calcload would be 100%. Now my highest MAF is 16 and %calcload never exceeds 98. I’m still not flooring the gas. Now any VE at higher loads is 85% to 94%. So, I believe the new MAF is more accurate and the old MAF was resulting in the negative double digit LTFTs. The old MAF was always correct at idle though and seemed correct at part throttle.

It continues to be a very fine point by which I can recreate the misfire or avoid. I did lengthy testing after these changes and found that by keeping TPS just below 50, %calcload would max at 93%, and misfire is avoided. If I TPS to just above 50, %calcload would get 97% or 98% and misfire would occur. See the two graphs; the more lengthy graph displays multiple events where %calcload reaches above 90%, MAF is 14 or 15, and misfire does not occur. There are no misfires in this lengthy drive. In the second shorter graph, I have recreated the misfire at both notable peaks with just a bit more TPS above 50, and %calcload up at 97 or 98.

It is quite a mystery what condition would occur so specifically to cause misfire in this way, without it happening otherwise.

I then performed RC test, battery voltage style, non-inverted, so of course the troughs are the compression strokes. See the two consecutive scope frames. It appears my non-automotive scope leaves a bit of a gap between frames, as well as being a bit messy on this test. It tells me I’m good on compression though. Feel free to examine.

Various higher load VEs tell me (according to the ATG instructions) I’m reasonably good on compression, and reasonably good on airflow. In fact, I’m running out of things it could be. Is it possible the CAT is clogged in some slight way, that only causes difficulty at highest loads? I plan on doing the CAT backpressure test upon getting a fitting, but this test might not reveal imperfections at higher load, or would it? Maybe the CAT is just fine as well.

Maybe with these changes, an †ECM reset’ by disconnecting the battery for a while is applicable? †Don’t know.

Let me know what you think. Of course, if you need full scan data, I can provide full CSV files.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Monday, November 6th, 2023 AT 7:12 AM
Tiny
KEN L
  • MASTER CERTIFIED MECHANIC
  • 43,356 POSTS
These readings are telling us you may have an intake valve leaking which will affect the other cylinders. Here is a guide to help run the test. Also, while the spark plugs are out check the condition and replace if needed.

https://www.2carpros.com/articles/how-to-test-engine-compression

Please go over this guide and get back to us.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Monday, November 6th, 2023 AT 8:37 AM
Tiny
SWALDO
  • MEMBER
  • 20 POSTS
Sure, can proceed with physical compression test. What readings are you seeing exactly that suggests that. The RC graphs, or the symptoms?
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Monday, November 6th, 2023 AT 9:46 AM
Tiny
AL514
  • MECHANIC
  • 4,180 POSTS
That is because of the low sampling rate, but the some of the humps do look a bit higher than others. It could also be a valve that is sticking at some points or just not sealing all the way, and like Ken said it will affect all cylinders because the compression pressure is being pushed back into the intake manifold on the compression stroke, when the intake valve is actually supposed to be closed. You can do a cylinder leakage test with the piston at top dead center, then put some compressed air into the cylinder and listen for it leaking into the intake manifold, you might hear it popping into the intake as well. But the calculated load is very high for light throttle cruising. Just looking at the Calculated load, where it's near 98% and the MAF is only at roughly 15lb/m your RPM would need to be around 3,200 RPMs for that to happen. But you're only at about 50% throttle. But do the back pressure test as well since you've got the tooling coming.
It looks like you have a MAP sensor as well, you could scope that signal, and if compression pressures are being pushed into the intake manifold you would see spikes in the MAP signal, it's only a 0 to 5volt signal, but that be good to watch for valve sealing issues. The MAP should be pretty steady as the throttle opens and closes, so if you see spikes in the signal, they shouldn't be there, at idle (high manifold vacuum) you should have low MAP voltage, and wide-open throttle (where manifold vacuum is low, positive pressure is rising) is should be higher towards 5v. Since the vehicle has one though, it's worth seeing if there are any pressure spikes coming from an intake valve not sealing.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Monday, November 6th, 2023 AT 1:40 PM
Tiny
SWALDO
  • MEMBER
  • 20 POSTS
You guessed the RPM pretty close, but since you are remarking something isn't quite right amongst the MAF, load, RPM and TPS, here is the full frames image at that misfire event (about row 163), and another image during which no misfire occurs. If there is something about MAF, load, RPM and TPS that doesn't add up that would be interesting. Although the TPS is around 50, plus or minus in all cases, I'm going through 1st and 2nd and accelerating rapidly when I intentionally recreate the misfire or come close but avoid, and MAP is always up there around 27" Hg. I suppose it's relative though, but it doesn't have a feel of light throttle cruising. At light throttle cruising (3rd or overdrive, highway etc, ) there is no malfunction.

If you're seeing some higher humps in the RC test, (I kind of see it in one image) tell me how it indicates intake valve as more likely than exhaust valve or rings. I'm curious there. In any case I'll proceed with the tests. Thanks both.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Tuesday, November 7th, 2023 AT 5:50 AM
Tiny
AL514
  • MECHANIC
  • 4,180 POSTS
I just mentioned the MAP because you can scope that signal and use it to tell if there are positive pressure spikes due to an intake valve issue. Your coolant temperature is low the entire time during that data. What's your long term and short-term fuel trim at idle? Warmed up but close throttle. Just looking through your live data here.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Tuesday, November 7th, 2023 AT 1:34 PM
Tiny
SWALDO
  • MEMBER
  • 20 POSTS
Here you go: Attached is scan data at idle (vehicle speed of 1 while in car wash). I suppose looking at a lot of my data, temp climbs to 205 only during idling, but is around mid 180's or so whenever moving. Let me know if that indicates anything.

Also attached, I performed the MAP scope while cranking for a good 5 or 6 seconds, including key on before and after, as you described and after further reading on the subject. I'm not sure if test is best performed while cranking, driving or idling. Let me know. Of course, the per cylinder intake strokes are well depicted here. Let me know your interpretation. Still planning on the other tests.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Wednesday, November 8th, 2023 AT 5:41 AM
Tiny
SWALDO
  • MEMBER
  • 20 POSTS
Perhaps the same can be done for exhaust strokes? Some sort of probe into O2 port. Perhaps there is one to detect crankcase blowby, some sort of probe into the dipstick? Thanks
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Wednesday, November 8th, 2023 AT 5:56 AM
Tiny
AL514
  • MECHANIC
  • 4,180 POSTS
Well, I was thinking more of using the MAP to see any intake pulses that should not be there. Another test you can do for valve sealing issues is a good ole vacuum gauge on the intake manifold. If it jumps around, that's a sign of a cylinder not sealing correctly. I've had this vacuum gauge chart forever; I should have thought of this to begin with. You can see on the chart that any valve issues will cause the needle to bounce all over the place. Your scope has a pretty low sampling rate, so it's inconclusive. There is a lot of noise in that signal, those downward spikes almost look like an ignition coil or wire strike. But the fuel trims look like the engine is rich at idle, with the negative numbers and then they come up closer to 0 at higher RPMs. But try the vacuum gauge on the intake manifold and see if it's steady or bounces around. The only issue is if you can duplicate the problem while testing. Checking for crankcase pressure will tell you if the rings are sealing correctly.
If you think it's a burnt exhaust valve then I would do a cylinder leak down test with compressed air into the cylinder, I have even seen a smoke machine used to determine a burnt exhaust valve.
But it seems like you're dealing with more of an intermittent problem. Since you mention its only at certain throttle position and engine load. Put a vacuum gauge on the intake manifold, somewhere you can see it from the driver's seat. And put the car in gear, and do a little brake torque, see if that causes a valve sealing issue to show itself.
And if you catch a bouncing needle at all, then do a leak down test.
And you're sure about the plugs and wires? I know you replaced the 3 coils, and the MAF so far plus injectors. So, we're down here to only a couple things here. How do the plugs look, and the plug gaps or electrode wear. Your fuel trims increased after the injector changed out because now you have injectors that are all flowing the correct amount.
Here's the entire flow chart for a P0300 code setting (pg 3-7). So you can go through that, I know you mentioned doing a back pressure test when the tools came, so check that at idle to just to cover your bases.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Wednesday, November 8th, 2023 AT 12:59 PM
Tiny
SWALDO
  • MEMBER
  • 20 POSTS
Answers to your questions first:

Yes, it is Bank 1 sensor 1, and Bank 1 sensor 2, as you labelled it. Apparently, there is no other bank.

The irony regarding the LTFTs is prior to injectors/MAF change, LTFTs at idle were always normal, and double-digit-negative whenever car is moving. Now it is the opposite, somewhat negative at idle and normal when part throttle or higher throttle.

I had checked existing wires for proper continuity and resistance, and visually inspected all plugs and found them all good. All with 50,000 miles on them. I’m going to change the plugs anyway while doing compression testing.

I plan on performing the in-cylinder pressure transducer test on all cylinders, cranking and running, as you had referenced earlier in our conversation. It appears from further reading that a conventional peak compression gauge will not necessarily reveal all. A Hantek automotive scope will be used as well. My current device only does 240K sa/s. In fact the waveforms I already got will be done over with the better scope.

And proceeding with the other tests including the vacuum test per your chart. It might take a bit of doing; I’ll let you know. Thanks
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Thursday, November 9th, 2023 AT 6:33 AM
Tiny
AL514
  • MECHANIC
  • 4,180 POSTS
How negative are the fuel trims at idle now? In-cylinder waveforms with a pressure transducer is a very effective testing method, although they do take a while to understand what you are seeing. I use a Pico scope for that type of testing because it has measurement rulers you can move from the first compression tower to the next 0 to 360 degrees, Ill post an example of that just to show you, but also have a small handheld 2 channel Hantek scope which has a multimeter and signal generator. I use that thing probably the most since I don't need a laptop to use it like a Pico requires. But the vacuum gauge with a bouncing needle will tell you right away if there is a cylinder sealing issue. I'm surprised there isn't a 02 sensor on bank 2, at least a front one, but you're right, looking at the wiring diagrams there is only 1 front and 1 post cat 02s. The 02 sensor 2 (rear) has a pretty steady voltage which is good, if the cat was allowing emissions gases passed it, the rear 02 would be fluctuating just about the same frequency as the front 02. So, it doesn't look like a converter issue, besides you would have a lack of power all the time if this was a restricted exhaust.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Saturday, November 11th, 2023 AT 1:17 PM
Tiny
SWALDO
  • MEMBER
  • 20 POSTS
The last image I gave you (that you then notated items in red) is indeed my current FTs at idle after injectors/MAF change. Just to illustrate, here is a previous image of idling before the injectors/MAF change. Then a second image of negative LTFT's while moving part throttle, prior to injector/MAF change. Now since injector/MAF change, the negative LTFTs while moving are no longer occurring, but they are negative at idle as you noticed. Car idles great either way. Car drives great either way until that TPS and load threshold is achieved.

I performed the Cat backpressure test and it passed. Pressure was about 1 PSI at 3,000 RPMs.

I performed the vacuum test, including the brake-torque technique. It passed with no bouncing needle whatsoever. The first 2 †normal’ images in your chart were consistent.
I paid no mind during the brake-torque to RPM, TPS or load, just did it sufficiently to get vacuum gauge to deflect steady to 5” hg or so (meaning 25” hg atmospheric pressure).
It all made me think... Since my issue only occurs at a certain load and TPS, perhaps this should be more precisely simulated for any test; I don’t know if that’s a proper or necessary technique though. But I’m getting the feeling the engine will pass any test at idle or lower load because there is no operational problem until I achieve 97% load, above 50% throttle, about 27” hg of atmosphere. I don’t know if I can get to that doing a brake-torque, or if it's too dangerous. So let me know what the conventional wisdom is on that. Meanwhile I’ll be doing the compression tests near future.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Monday, November 13th, 2023 AT 10:44 AM
Tiny
AL514
  • MECHANIC
  • 4,180 POSTS
Well, the issue is that it will fail the inspection if they hook it up to the DLC and either the P0300 is set or depending on the extent of their testing machine, the I/M Readiness monitors are not passed (or are okay). It seems more like you're dealing with a fish bite misfire under load, which now is more likely to be ignition related, unless you end up seeing something more on your compression testing. If you didn't notice anything with a vacuum gauge during a brake torque which is a load on the engine. The cat is fine at 1 PSI. I'm not sure how you would simulate anything else, the only things I notice left are the old plugs and wires, and the slow switching of the front oxygen sensor, but that might be slow scan tool data. It should be switching from lean (0.2 roughly) to rich (0.8v roughly) every 300-500ms (0.5sec) so every 1 second it should be switching 0.2v-0.8v-0.2v-0.8v. Thats about the frequency the front oxygen sensor should be at. It's not going to give you that misfire you're experiencing, it can still be a valve intermittently sticking, but under higher loads like you're having, compression is going to be built up and be higher due to higher engine RPMs.
Check this video out, this guy does a really good job at explaining what an ignition misfire will feel like.
Granted the vehicle is older and has high mileage, so at that mileage of 225,000, it needed a new MAF, and we could see by the after results that the injectors were partially clogged. Thats all normal wear. I've been working on this 07 Nissan Pathfinder 4.0 with 257,000 miles on it. And once I fix one thing, it needs something else. The customer is a friend and I'm doing the labor for free, but he still doesn't fully understand when I'm explaining things to him. He made it about 3,000 miles since the last repair. He can't afford another vehicle because he and his wife are both very sick, so I'm just fixing things as we go. But everything is just plain worn out. I'm currently fixing 3 major vacuum leaks that it didn't have 3,000 miles ago, I showed him the last fuel trims compared to the current and its very obvious. But it also needs plugs I'm sure, the injectors are probably clogged up as well, I can feel the misfire at idle, it's got a bad cat on bank 1, etc.
I think the testing you're doing is really important though, it will help in the future for sure if someone can't figure something out. The negative fuel trims you're seeing at idle could very well be a slow switching 02, and as the engine RPMs increases the front 02 switching frequency will increase, bringing the fuel trims back to normal ranges, but on an older vehicle like this, +/-10% is normal. So, I would do the wires when you do the plugs as well, make sure they are gapped correctly and don't put in cheap plugs, you will end up replacing them with better ones in the long run anyway. Service info only gives a part number on the plugs, but I think ACDelco is GM OEM. Just check the gap on these, try not to adjust it if possible. I use rockauto a lot, they have really good prices. I'm also very interested to hear about anymore scope testing you do, after we get this vehicle squared away, you can leave me your email and keep in touch if you want to chat more on testing. We don't get many customers on here that use a scope at all, so it's really great that you're into that for testing, I use mine for anything I can. Sorry for the super long message here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4bvnC7rz0c

I can across this video as well, it's a bit long but very interesting:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQtSrrRpHYI
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Monday, November 13th, 2023 AT 2:39 PM
Tiny
SWALDO
  • MEMBER
  • 20 POSTS
Well, the new spark plugs and wires fixed it. Total success now.

It was interesting to scope each spark waveform before and after. Just about every cylinder (before changing) had a different look or abnormal feature according to the info you showed me, and other charts. Normal waveform was not achieved until new spark and new wire were tried. And I tried different combos of new wire/old spark or old wire/new spark.

Attached is a photo of a typical plug that was replaced (AC Delco OEM). These were all inspected in August and quickly determined †still good’ and re-installed. Plus, all wires got a continuity and resistance check then also. And they all had only 50K miles and 7 years on them. Very interesting.

I suppose the vacuum test last weekend (which I also did with scope on MAP), and that video you then sent were quite revealing, especially the guy explaining †misfires that only occur under load are just about always ignition’. I skipped the physical compression tests and went straight to changing spark and wire.

I got all the pieces to do pressure transducer waveform, so I’ll probably pursue that semi-recreationally at some point in any case.

Sure, we can trade e-mails on such things. Maybe I’ll have a waveform at some point for you to interpret.

I got a Hantek 1008C scope for a modest price, and several built-in tests are included (including the spark waveform). The strange thing is even though it comes with built in RC test, and assumption that the Hantek amp clamp is in use (I didn’t get that), it does not allow one to choose AC coupling in that test or anyway at all. So, in order to try RC test just for the heck of it (doing battery voltage once again) I put a capacitor in series to approximate AC coupling and I got a waveform that is messy but informative once again (attached). The RC result I showed back a couple posts with my previous scope (which does have AC coupling) is neater looking but had gaps between frames, due to low sampling rate. So the old scope had 240Ksa/s †new one has 2.4Msa/s.

So, all the information on scoping to diagnose was very helpful. I had no idea and previously assumed that all the answers are within scan data. Much appreciated.

Scott
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
Monday, November 20th, 2023 AT 6:23 AM
Tiny
KEN L
  • MASTER CERTIFIED MECHANIC
  • 43,356 POSTS
AL514 is one of our best! Use 2CarPros anytime, we are here to help. Please tell a friend.
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Monday, November 20th, 2023 AT 7:26 AM
Tiny
AL514
  • MECHANIC
  • 4,180 POSTS
There is a ton of noise on that waveform, I don't know if they have included any filtering with the Hantek software, I tried it a couple of times when I got into scope use, but it was terrible, so I went straight to a Pico scope. The software is free to demo, it works once you plug in one of their scopes. All that noise you're seeing is probably from the ignition system, being that this vehicle has plug wires and not coil over plug design. An amp clamp will work much better. I do use the 650Amp clamp from Hantek and a 65amp from AESWave. I had a 65amp from Hantek, but it melted from an alternator wire that had high resistance and was super-hot. I wouldn't go so far as to say every misfire under load is always going to be ignition related, and intermittent sticking valve can be very difficult to diagnose, especially if it's coming and going with temperature. But glad you got it fixed up. I'll drop you an email so we can chat about scopes, there seems to be almost endless use for them now. But if you run into any other issues, use the site, it helps us out a lot when we get more traffic, no pun intended. But check out picotech. Com and I'll be in touch. Al
Was this
answer
helpful?
Yes
No
+1
Monday, November 20th, 2023 AT 8:22 AM

Please login or register to post a reply.

Sponsored links